ANT Formulation Guide
| PROBLEM/S: Understandings of the problem/s, ideas about cause focus of the problems, who is identified as having the problems, diagnosis – family , school, extended family, professional services… | |
| PREDISPOSING: Background and history, Dangers (traumas and losses) , attachment strategies of parents/carers/children (Facts and defensive processes in how facts are narrated) Financial, racial, gender related dangers | |
| PRECIPITATING: Key events that are seen as triggering the difficulties, dangers, losses, separations, transitions, illnesses etc | |
| PRPOTECTIVE: Corrective script/positive intentions, sources of support, skills ,/abilities, resources | |
| PERPETUATING: relational dynamics maintaining the problems, core circularities( specific episodes and overall dynamics | |
| INTEGRATIVE FORMULATION: How the 5 Ps can be integrated to an overall dynamic of how the problems are being maintained by current attachment/systemic dynamics |
EXAMPLE: Jane and family
| PROBLEM/S: Understandings of the problem/s in different contexts ( home, school etc) , ideas about causes, focus of the problems - who is identified as having the problems, diagnosis – family , school, extended family, professional services… | Jane thinks her children Freda and Carl are suffering with anxiety and bereavement problems School thinks Jane’s anxiety about death of their neighbour is ‘rubbing off’ on the children |
| PREDISPOSING: Background and history, Dangers (traumas and losses) , attachment strategies of parents/carers/children (Facts and defensive processes in how facts are narrated) Financial, racial, gender related dangers | Janes’ own attachment history is of a ‘harsh critical mother’ , she had to be independent – a De-activating self- protective strategy History of her neighbour being depressed and suicidal Husband ( Matt) working long hours, Jane managing the children, suffered with fibro - myalgia |
| PRECIPITATING: Key events that are seen as triggering the difficulties, dangers, losses, separations, transitions, illnesses etc | 2 years previously neighbour (Stan) who was an older family friend committed suicide 6 months after his wife left him. Jane discovered his body and had to shortly go to the scene again to identify him when police arrived. |
| PRPOTECTIVE: Corrective script/positive intentions, sources of support, skills ,/abilities, resources | Corrective scripts – Jane wants to be a more emotionally available, warm and supportive mother than her own mother. Describes her marriage as close and supportive. School described as supportive |
| PERPETUATING: relational dynamics maintaining the problems, core circularities( specific episodes and overall dynamics | Jane and Matt decided to tell the children neighbour died of cancer. But children pick up mum’s anxiety (trauma) when they ask about him and consequently become more anxious. In interactions with the children Jane become anxious/angry with them. Matt tells her to ‘chill out’ which make her feel unsupported and failing |
| INTEGRATIVE FORMULATION: How the 5 Ps can be integrated to an overall dynamic of how the problems are being maintained by current attachment/systemic dynamics | Jane’s pre-dominant self - protective attachment strategy is to avoid confrontation and difficult emotions if possible. So, she minimises her own needs and attempts to dismiss her trauma and displaces it into concern for her children . But in turn the children’s display of anxiety leads to her feeling a failure and blamed as a mum and therefore seeking help for the children rather than herself. She also feels blamed by services which aggravates her sense of failure and further fosters the focus on the children. Attempts to minimise the problem and ‘move on’ by Matt makes Jane feel she is at fault and further pushes the problems as ‘in the children’ |
An Example: Jean and her family
The children were reported by mum to be highly anxious. Older boy had a diagnosis of autism. School observed that the children were not anxious at school and felt mum was projecting her anxiety on to them. There had been a suicide of an older neighbour that the family and parents were close to. His wife had left him 2 years ago and mum had been offering some support for him. She found him hanging in his shed. She said she had flash backs about this and wanted to protect the children who asked about the neighbour. She made up a story with her husband’s agreement that he had committed suicide. However, the children repeatedly asked, and she was finding it hard to maintain the story and also started to see the children as developing anxiety. She wanted help for the children which was not forthcoming from CAMHS (because it was a bereavement issues) not from the bereavement services because there was deception about the loss. Her husband was said to be ‘laid back’ and felt she was making too much of all this.
Her formulation: the children are anxious and need treatment
School: Mum’s anxiety is rubbing off on the children
Our systemic/attachment formulation: Mum’s distress is becoming aggravated by being in a continual, position of having to engage in deception with the children. They are picking up that ‘something is not right’ and so keep asking for more information. The school seeing mum as the cause and her husband as her making ‘too much’ of things is aggravating her trauma. Her ow parents are ‘strict’ and she feels do not support her apart from with practical help.